WHO ARE WE?
OUR STORY
Back in 2005, Dave Fearon, Jr. published his University of Santa Barbara Dissertation for his Ph.D. in Sociology: “Social Enaction: How Talk-in-Interaction Constitutes Social Organization.” He and his father, Dave, Sr, hoped they could find ways to formerly collaborate on developing the power of the methodology and findings in Dave’s groundbreaking work.
And they did! They established the domain in turns of talk in every intentional conversation. Podcasting such conversations is both an offering and a laboratory. They begin with Dave, Sr talking episodically with Peter Vaill for making sense of the nature of Practice. Perhaps it is a social organization enacted by one visible to many. Regardless, this is the birthplace of a new platform for all things related to the power of conversation.
THE CONVERSATIONALISTS
David Fearon, Sr.
David Fearon, Jr.
Peter B. Vaill
Dave is a retired professor of management & organizational behavior, living in New Hartford, CT and enjoying being underfoot. Keeping his 50-year academic career as close as possible to action-takers, Dave has taught and led in several regionally-centered public universities where most students work while attending college. He strives to inspire learner ownership of theory for future use. Dave is now a podcaster, a practitioner of conversations, and a lifelong teacher.
David is far from retired and is in practice as a Senior Data Management Consultant with Johns Hopkins University Data Management Services where he trains and assists in designing to curate research data in the social sciences and medicine. He is crafting his own advancing library science curation practice to keep pace with the digitization of research itself; changing rules, pace, and complexity of results in traditional and emerging fields of research.
Peter Vaill (1936-2020) was a retired professor of managerial leadership, living in Minneapolis, MN and enjoying “assisted living.” His career began in 1960 at the Harvard Business School where, from the very beginning, he was taught the interdependence of theory and practice. Peter was all about redressing the balance, in showing that Practice has a depth and complexity every bit as fascinating as Theory – a depth and complexity that Theory could learn a lot from!
OUR PURPOSE
Social enaction is a way of defining social organization as a production and result of social interaction in practice. It focuses primarily on instances of talk among participants engaged in interaction.
Each subject of conversation featured on this site is enacted in turns to talk; novel meanings brought forth as discussants interact with a shared desire for mutual understanding. Our purpose is to discover, capture, and share primary meanings as they are enacted.
We draw upon three common ways of defining “enaction” as a metaphor for empirical features of communication:
-
Enact: “performance” occurring as an individual’s course of action is oriented to the others most salient as the “audience.”
-
Enact: to “bring forth” a social domain for an observer. Social organization is not “contained” within abstract representation, but “brought forth” by the practice of talk with co-presenting others.
-
Enact: to “warrant” as a broad sense of the dictionary meaning of enact as “make into law.” Participants in interaction work out “private domain” intentions and experiences through talk, in part by being able to indicate and orient to what they have indicated publicly so far to each other, word by word, phrase by phrase, to what was just said.
OUR VALUES
-
There is far more to talk than meets the ear.
-
There is nothing ordinary in what people in conversation are revealing to each other.
-
Knowledge (knowing) happens in moments of social interactions.
-
Meaning lives in conversational states of constantly originating and revising emerging ideas.
OUR GOALS
-
Record episodic conversations between and among exploring thinkers
-
Develop a new convention with podcasting exhibiting scholarly work in the making
-
Build awareness of how talk-in-interaction constitutes social organization
-
Examine individuals’ practice as social organization